Bone Disease clinical trials at UC Health
2 in progress, 0 open to eligible people
Expanded Access Protocol (EAP) Using the CliniMACS® Device for Pediatric Haplocompatible Donor Stem Cell Transplant
Sorry, not accepting new patients
This protocol provides expanded access to bone marrow transplants for children who lack a histocompatible (tissue matched) stem cell or bone marrow donor when an alternative donor (unrelated donor or half-matched related donor) is available to donate. In this procedure, some of the blood forming cells (the stem cells) are collected from the blood of a partially human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched (haploidentical) donor and are transplanted into the patient (the recipient) after administration of a "conditioning regimen". A conditioning regimen consists of chemotherapy and sometimes radiation to the entire body (total body irradiation, or TBI), which is meant to destroy the cancer cells and suppress the recipient's immune system to allow the transplanted cells to take (grow). A major problem after a transplant from an alternative donor is increased risk of Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD), which occurs when donor T cells (white blood cells that are involved with the body's immune response) attack other tissues or organs like the skin, liver and intestines of the transplant recipient. In this study, stem cells that are obtained from a partially-matched donor will be highly purified using the investigational CliniMACS® stem cell selection device in an effort to achieve specific T cell target values. The primary aim of the study is to help improve overall survival with haploidentical stem cell transplant in a high risk patient population by limiting the complication of GVHD.
Outcomes Following Severe Distal Tibia, Ankle and/or Foot Trauma: Comparison of Limb Salvage Versus Transtibial Amputation Protocol
Sorry, in progress, not accepting new patients
The primary aim this prospective longitudinal observational outcomes study is to compare 18 month functional outcomes and health related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients undergoing salvage versus amputation following severe distal tibia, ankle and/or foot fractures with major soft tissue, bone and/or ankle articular surface loss. Functional outcomes and HRQoL will be measured using well established self reported measures, including the Veterans Rand Health Survey (VR-12) and the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA). Hypothesis 1: As a group, salvage patients with severe distal tibia, ankle and/or foot injuries with major soft tissue, bone and/or ankle articular surface loss will have similar functional outcomes and HRQoL had they undergone a transtibial amputation (within 6 weeks of injury). Hypothesis 2: The subgroup of salvage patients who have either (1) a soft tissue injury that requires tissue transfer; (2) articular damage requiring arthrodesis of the ankle joint; or (3) bone loss at the distal tibia or ankle will have better functional outcomes and HRQoL had they undergone a transtibial amputation (within 6 weeks of injury).