Skip to main content

Injuries clinical trials at University of California Health

5 in progress, 0 open to eligible people

Showing trials for
  • Communication Tool to Improve Communication in the ICU

    Sorry, accepting new patients by invitation only

    The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of the Best Case/Worst Case-ICU communication tool on quality of communication, clinician moral distress, and ICU length of stay for older adults with serious traumatic injury. Investigators will follow an estimated 4500 patients aged 50 years and older who are in the ICU for 3 or more days and survey 1500 family members and up to 1600 clinicians from 8 sites nationwide.

    at UC Davis

  • BE1116 in Patients With Traumatic Injury and Acute Major Bleeding to Improve Survival ( TAP Study )

    Sorry, not currently recruiting here

    This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, large simple trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of a single intravenous (IV) infusion of BE1116 in subjects who have traumatic injury, with confirmed or suspected acute major bleeding and / or predicted to receive a large volume blood product transfusion.

    at UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA UCSD UCSF

  • Improving Family-Centered Pediatric Trauma Care: The Standard of Care Versus the Virtual Pediatric Trauma Center

    “You are eligible to participate in a study that may improve health care for you, your family, and your community!”

    Sorry, in progress, not accepting new patients

    More than 41 million children, or 55 percent of all children in the United States, live more than 30 minutes away from a pediatric trauma center. The management of pediatric trauma requires medical expertise that is only available at Level I pediatric trauma centers, which are specialized pediatric referral hospitals located in large urban cities. Smaller hospitals lack pediatric trauma expertise and resources to properly care for these children. When a small hospital receives a child with trauma, the standard of care is to conduct a telephone consultation to a pediatric trauma specialist, err on the side of safety, and transfer the child to the regional Level I pediatric trauma center. A newer model of care, the Virtual Pediatric Trauma Center (VPTC), uses live video, or telemedicine, to bring the expertise of a Level I pediatric trauma center virtually to patients at any hospital emergency department. While the VPTC model is being used more frequently, the advantages and disadvantages of these two systems of care remain unknown, particularly with regard to parent/family-centered outcomes. The goal of this study is to optimize the patient and family experience and to minimize distress, healthcare utilization, and out-of-pocket costs following the injury of a child. The results of this project will help to optimize communication, confidence, and shared decision making between parents/families and clinical staff from both the transferring and receiving hospitals.

    at UC Davis

  • Trauma Follow-Up Prediction (Project 2: Aim 2)

    Sorry, not yet accepting patients

    Approximately 9% of the world's deaths, more than 5 million deaths annually, are due to injury. In high-income countries, where the epidemiology and outcomes of traumatic injury are well characterized, trauma primarily affects young, productive members of the population and is associated with significant long-term disability. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries like Cameroon, injured people face multiple obstacles to trauma care, including potentially lifesaving follow-up care after hospital discharge. The Investigators' community-based survey of 8,065 patients in South west Cameroon found that 34.6% of injured respondents did not seek immediate formal care after injury, and another 9.9% only sought formal care after alternative means, such as consultation with traditional medicine practitioners. In Cameroon, for the 65.4% of injured people who seek formal care after injury,5 therapeutic itineraries can be complex, often involving poorly supported referrals to other facilities or transitions away from formal care. As a result, formal systems of care fail to retain trauma patients for follow-up care, a missed opportunity as these patients have already overcome significant financial and personal challenges to seek initial care for their injuries. Consequently, discharged trauma patients who may benefit from follow-up care often delay care until advanced complications develop. The objective of this study is to evaluate a machine learning optimized phone-based screening tool that predicts which trauma patients are most likely to benefit from follow-up care. A Cluster randomized trial controlled trail will be carried out in 10 hospitals in Cameroon involving 852 trauma patients. The control group shall use the existing standard mHealth screening tool while the intervention shall use the optimized version of the mHealth screening tool (intervention) using the machine learning approach. Patients shall be followed up over a 6 months period to determine the proportion of trauma post discharge patients that need follow up care using mobile phone.

    at UCLA

  • Trauma Follow-Up Prediction (Project 2: Aim 1)

    Sorry, not yet accepting patients

    Traumatic injury and inadequate follow-up care are a significant cause of morbidity and 10% of all deaths in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). In Cameroon, ~50% of all emergency department (ED) visits are due to traumatic injury, which is likely only ~60% of all traumatic injuries. In the subset of patients who seek care, follow-up after discharge can save lives, yet is uncommon due to both supply-side (e.g., under-resourced health systems, poor data) and demand-side (e.g., poverty) barriers, resulting in preventable complications after discharge (e.g., sepsis, osteomyelitis). Consequently, better follow-up care of trauma patients is a neglected, but high-yield opportunity to improve injury outcomes, especially when coupled with mobile health technologies (mHealth) to better predict and implement post-discharge care, preventing disability and death. Thus, in this study, the investigators will scale up an existing trauma registry and expand use of a mHealth screening tool (triage tool). At 10 hospitals, the investigators will implement a trauma registry and mHealth tool and evaluate success in a mixed-methods study; a quantitative prospective cohort of all eligible injured patients will be followed for 6 months after discharge and an inductive qualitative study.

    at UCLA

Our lead scientists for Injuries research studies include .

Last updated: