Summary

Location
at UCSD
Dates
study started
study ends around

Description

Summary

This is a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation parallel cluster randomized superiority trial designed to compare two strategies to promote early supraglottic airway (SA) rescue during neonatal resuscitation, with a focus on implementation outcomes.

Official Title

Comparing Two Multicomponent Strategies To Promote Supraglottic Airway Implementation During Neonatal Resuscitation

Details

Each year, approximately 3.8 million infants are born in the United States, and up to 10% require resuscitation to establish breathing at birth. Positive pressure ventilation (PPV) is the most important intervention during neonatal resuscitation and is most often delivered via facemask. However, facemask ventilation can be technically challenging, and difficulties with mask seal, airway positioning, and obstruction frequently lead to ventilation failure. Such delays prolong life-threatening asphyxia and increase the risk of morbidity and mortality.

The supraglottic airway (SA) is an FDA-approved, widely available, and evidence-based alternative airway device for delivering PPV. It is safe, easy to use, and recommended in international neonatal resuscitation guidelines as an option when facemask ventilation is ineffective or endotracheal intubation is unsuccessful or not feasible. Despite strong supporting evidence, uptake of SA use in neonatal resuscitation remains low. A recent national survey of more than 5,000 Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) providers found that only 12% had ever used an SA. Reported barriers to adoption included limited clinical experience, insufficient training opportunities, preference for alternative approaches, lack of availability of SA devices in the delivery room, and limited awareness of supporting evidence.

The Supraglottic Airway for Resuscitation (SUGAR) Trial is designed to address the critical evidence-to-practice gap by evaluating strategies to increase the use of supraglottic airways (SA) during neonatal resuscitation. This trial will assess the comparative effectiveness of two implementation strategies while examining the contextual factors that influence their success, with the goal of identifying barriers and facilitators to sustainable SA adoption across diverse clinical settings. By testing approaches to integrate SA use into routine neonatal resuscitation, the study aims to improve both implementation and clinical outcomes, ultimately reducing the risk of prolonged asphyxia and enhancing survival and health for newborns in the delivery room.

Keywords

Neonatal Resuscitation, Delivery Room Resuscitation, Positive Pressure Ventilation, Infant, Newborn, Supraglottic Airway, Laryngeal Mask Airways, Implementation Research

Eligibility

Population 1: Hospital Staff

Population 1a: Clinical providers and administrators who complete study questionnaires

Clinical provider 1a inclusion criteria:

  • Employed full-time by the hospital, affiliated practice, or affiliated university in a role that involves newborn resuscitation
  • Fluent in English

Administrator 1a inclusion criteria

  • Oversee the care of newborns on a local level (e.g. nurse manager) or a hospital level (e.g. Chief Quality and Safety Officer)
  • Fluent in English

Clinical provider and administrator exclusion 1a criteria: No exclusion criteria

Population 1b: Clinical providers who participate in qualitative interviews

Clinical provider 1b inclusion criteria:

  • Employed full-time by the hospital, affiliated practice, or affiliated university in a role that involves newborn resuscitation
  • Fluent in English

Clinical provider 1b exclusion criteria: No exclusion criteria

Population 2: Patients who receive neonatal resuscitation at birth

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inborn (not transferred to the hospital after birth)
  • ≥34 weeks' gestation at birth, based on best obstetrical estimate
  • Received PPV during neonatal resuscitation (as per provider's clinical assessment)

Exclusion Criteria:

Locations

  • Jacobs Medical Center at University of California San Diego Health
    San Diego 5391811 California 5332921 92037 United States
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
    Los Angeles 5368361 California 5332921 90048 United States
  • Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women & Newborns
    San Diego 5391811 California 5332921 92123 United States
  • Sharp Grossmont Hospital
    La Mesa 5363990 California 5332921 91942 United States
  • Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center
    Chula Vista 5336899 California 5332921 91911 United States
  • Lucile Packard Children's Hospital
    Palo Alto 5380748 California 5332921 94304 United States

Details

Status
not yet accepting patients
Start Date
Completion Date
(estimated)
Sponsor
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
ID
NCT07150923
Study Type
Interventional
Participants
Expecting 36503 study participants
Last Updated